|
Post by selluwud on Nov 24, 2014 15:46:21 GMT
"Team Bullard"
I think you're on to something. I like teams though, it implies competition which is always a great motivator. Even with truth and fiction in the way, winning or losing should be the outcome regardless. I hate ties.
|
|
|
Post by HeyNow on Nov 24, 2014 16:08:38 GMT
"We view this as an important step to further enable the development of our novel biological therapy in the EU with the aim of seeking marketing authorization approval." – Anglade
“They won't be commercializing with MA-09.” “ACT will need to switch to a new line prior to commercialization.” "The current line being used (MA-09) will not be commercially viable." "I'm fairly certain they cannot and will not commercialize with the MA-09 line.” -Rocky-esque
Sincerely, Cult member 001
|
|
|
Post by ridda on Nov 24, 2014 16:50:16 GMT
Can I be cult member number 002 please since I follow your lead, HeyNow?
|
|
|
Post by Keybridge - Cult Member 003 on Nov 24, 2014 16:54:00 GMT
Can I be cult member number 002 please since I follow your lead, HeyNow? I want to be cult member number 007. I like my RPE cells shaken, not stirred.
|
|
|
Post by HeyNow on Nov 24, 2014 16:56:03 GMT
Can I be cult member number 002 please since I follow your lead, HeyNow? Unfortunatly, I don't determine who is in the cult, JHam does. But, I think to get in the cult all you have to do is disagree with tradeup
|
|
|
Post by stemwinder on Nov 24, 2014 16:57:09 GMT
Can I be cult member number 002 please since I follow your lead, HeyNow? I want to be cult member number 007. I like my RPE cells shaken, not stirred. I like my RPE cells with a big swig of trophic factors.
|
|
|
Post by islands64 - 99 on Nov 24, 2014 17:11:54 GMT
Cult member 99 here!
|
|
|
Post by CM kipper007 on Nov 24, 2014 17:30:21 GMT
007 would have been my prefer number, but I'll take 101.
|
|
|
Post by Whidbeygal CM 20/20 on Nov 24, 2014 17:37:50 GMT
0020/20 is my cult number.
|
|
|
Post by icellman on Nov 24, 2014 17:52:08 GMT
I'm cult number 69!!! LOL!!!
|
|
horus
Junior Member
Posts: 96
|
Post by horus on Nov 24, 2014 17:54:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Keybridge - Cult Member 003 on Nov 24, 2014 17:54:47 GMT
007 would have been my prefer number, but I'll take 101. Alright - If you display the 007 on your profile, it's yours. I'll figure something else out. (Maybe I'll take 200, in honor of Bullard's self proclaimed I.Q.) Honestly, we should all take "Cult Member Numbers."
|
|
|
Post by Keybridge - Cult Member 003 on Nov 24, 2014 17:55:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Nov 24, 2014 18:14:43 GMT
Unfortunately, I remember the good ole days before Jim Jones ruined it for everybody. Good ole sugary goodness......yum, yum...recommended by your family dentist.
|
|
|
Post by jckrdu on Nov 24, 2014 19:42:48 GMT
What's even more comical are his boyfriends liking his posts and running to his defense. Kind of reminds me of how you agree with anything HeyNow says. Do you ever post any of your own original ideas or just like to latch onto and ride other's coattails? It is amazing that after all the years of providing unfiltered DD in a very Rocky-esque manner, that now tradeup of all people is getting thrown under the bus. I guess no one is immune to the ACT/Ocata-cult. Once they label you as being "negative" you better run for the hills. JHam - Hundreds of people read this board. Relatively very few post on it. The ones that do post are - IMO - most likely to hold strong opinions either way; positive or negative. So, not a big surpirse to me to see some throw Tradeup under the bus. Just human nature I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by Keybridge - Cult Member 003 on Nov 24, 2014 20:20:34 GMT
Kind of reminds me of how you agree with anything HeyNow says. Do you ever post any of your own original ideas or just like to latch onto and ride other's coattails? It is amazing that after all the years of providing unfiltered DD in a very Rocky-esque manner, that now tradeup of all people is getting thrown under the bus. I guess no one is immune to the ACT/Ocata-cult. Once they label you as being "negative" you better run for the hills. JHam - Hundreds of people read this board. Relatively very few post on it. The ones that do post are - IMO - most likely to hold strong opinions either way; positive or negative. So, not a big surpirse to me to see some throw Tradeup under the bus. Just human nature I suppose. It's one thing to dismiss the Heynow-Trade debate as just passion for their respective points of view. But speaking for myself, though I believe I'm on target, is that promoting something in a patchwork fashion that suggests that maybe the treatment is dangerous ("you'll contract priors") or commerically not viable, is clearly meant to undermine the company, either by scaring away potential patients who might otherwise benefit from enrollment in the trials, or investors that would otherwise being willing to invest in this stock except for something inaccurate that they read about in a S.A. article - not everyone understands that S.A. artcles are written by non-professional journalist. Not everyone knows that M. West has his own agenda. It's the collective effort to deliberately undermine OCAT and what it has to offer, which has many of us cult members royally pissed off.
|
|
|
Post by jckrdu on Nov 24, 2014 20:46:42 GMT
JHam - Hundreds of people read this board. Relatively very few post on it. The ones that do post are - IMO - most likely to hold strong opinions either way; positive or negative. So, not a big surpirse to me to see some throw Tradeup under the bus. Just human nature I suppose. It's one thing to dismiss the Heynow-Trade debate as just passion for their respective points of view. But speaking for myself, though I believe I'm on target, is that promoting something in a patchwork fashion that suggests that maybe the treatment is dangerous ("you'll contract priors") or commerically not viable, is clearly meant to undermine the company by scaring away potential patients who might otherwise benefit from enrollment in the trials, or investors that would otherwise being willing to invest in this stock except for something inaccurate that they read about in a S.A. article - not everyone understands that S.A. artcles are written by non-professional journalist. Not everyone knows that M. West has his own agenda. It's the collective effort to deliberately undermine OCAT and what it has to offer, which has many of us cult members royally pissed off. Key - I understand what you're saying regarding the recent SA article, and generally agree on that point. But, to lump-in Tradeups long history of relevant due diligence (positive and negative) and his recent DD on MA09 and potential licensure issues with that other stuff is beyond ludicrous, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by HeyNow on Nov 24, 2014 21:06:50 GMT
Speaking in all seriousness (this the best I can do to extend an olive branch), I thoroughly enjoy debating tradeup when there are particular points I disagree with him. I think good progress is often made understanding some of these issues (for me at least), and while he may not budge on certain things I don't agree with, at least the conversation is out there for all to read. And at least he responds and continues the dialogue, unlike some prolific SA authors.
(But, there's a but)
The few debates we've had recently immediately become annoying (and then borderline maddening), and abruptly end, when JHam and Jckrdu hop on in to blast me and give me a spanking (and sometimes with a little nudge from tradeup, threaten to delete my posts). At least there's a good debate to be had before you two have seen enough and come in to end it.
|
|
|
Post by jckrdu on Nov 24, 2014 21:14:57 GMT
Speaking in all seriousness (this the best I can do to extend an olive branch), I thoroughly enjoy debating tradeup when there are particular points I disagree with him. I think good progress is often made understanding some of these issues (for me at least), and while he may not budge on certain things I don't agree with, at least the conversation is out there for all to read. And at least he responds and continues the dialogue, unlike some prolific SA authors. (But, there's a but) The few debates we've had recently immediately become annoying (and then borderline maddening), and abruptly end, when JHam and Jckrdu hop on in to blast me and give me a spanking (and sometimes with a little nudge from tradeup, threaten to delete my posts). At least there's a good debate to be had before you two have seen enough and come in to end it. HeyNow - Debate all you want. You'll never see me, Jham or any other moderator on this site end on on going debate. But (yes... there's a but) the minute you or anyone else starts accusing anyone on this site of having and agenda and accuse them of DELIBERATELY posting misleading or false information to try and manipulate sentiment, that's when I'll continue to jump in... as those accusations are a TOS violation. This thread is literally full of those accusations leveled at Tradeup. If I were him, I'd pack up and just send my due diligence to a select few on this site, and let everyone else do their own research... or go back to ICELL and rely on CDC's or STEMD's pumpy nonsense. Fact is, Tradeup has provided the lion's share of DD on this site, so yeah... I'll continue to get a little testy if I see people throwing out speculative accusations.
|
|
|