|
|
Post by icellman on Dec 17, 2014 17:54:15 GMT
All I can say is I would be a little nervous if I were like some on this board who say they are waiting for the pricing of the stock. At this point NO one knows what is going to happen and with every uptick, it gets more interesting. Funny how we haven't heard from any of them yet with the price action.
Icell, You're trying to stir people up.
|
|
|
|
Post by ignorantsilver on Dec 21, 2014 2:25:44 GMT
I'm happy to have someone like hop expressing our collective poss offedness. Maybe it'll help shareholders one day wake up and stop continually ************************.
Unnecessary language
|
|
horus
Junior Member
Posts: 96 
|
Post by horus on Dec 21, 2014 19:21:03 GMT
I wonder who's alternate ID is Darkest? Err.. I mean, welcome to the board Darkest?
|
|
|
|
Post by darkest on Dec 21, 2014 19:35:38 GMT
I wonder who's alternate ID is Darkest? Err.. I mean, welcome to the board Darkest? That's the kind of comment I've come to expect here after reading this board. Rather juvenile. |
|
horus
Junior Member
Posts: 96
|
Post by horus on Dec 21, 2014 19:50:36 GMT
Well if you are new to the board then I think you should be banned because all 9 of your posts are trolling asshole nonsense.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkest on Dec 21, 2014 20:17:14 GMT
Well if you are new to the board then I think you should be banned because all 9 of your posts are trolling asshole nonsense. I'm offended you called me an asshole. I think you should be censored. |
|
|
|
Post by CM kipper007 on Dec 21, 2014 20:31:49 GMT
I wonder who's alternate ID is Darkest? Err.. I mean, welcome to the board Darkest? That's the kind of comment I've come to expect here after reading this board. Rather juvenile. You could just go somewhere else then if you don't like this one. |
|
|
|
Post by darkest on Dec 21, 2014 20:38:08 GMT
That's the kind of comment I've come to expect here after reading this board. Rather juvenile. You could just go somewhere else then if you don't like this one. Sounds like a Yahoo answer. |
|
|
|
Post by CM kipper007 on Dec 21, 2014 20:43:00 GMT
You could just go somewhere else then if you don't like this one. Sounds like a Yahoo answer. Funny, I stopped going there a while back as there were too many posters bashing the stock like you're doing. Yahoo really might be better for you. |
|
|
|
Post by darkest on Dec 21, 2014 21:13:16 GMT
Sounds like a Yahoo answer. Funny, I stopped going there a while back as there were too many posters bashing the stock like you're doing. Yahoo really might be better for you. Is that where the people who make money on this stock post? |
|
|
|
Post by CM kipper007 on Dec 21, 2014 21:25:46 GMT
Funny, I stopped going there a while back as there were too many posters bashing the stock like you're doing. Yahoo really might be better for you. Is that where the people who make money on this stock post? Not sure. You should go ask them. See ya! |
|
|
|
Post by darkest on Dec 21, 2014 22:48:17 GMT
Sounds like a Yahoo answer. Funny, I stopped going there a while back as there were too many posters bashing the stock like you're doing. Yahoo really might be better for you. Sure ya did. Why lie? |
|
|
|
Post by bigbang on Dec 22, 2014 18:22:08 GMT
Nobody made 30 accounts to tilt the vote (as evidenced by the results). That would be a complete waste of time and energy. I did think it was appropriate though to mock the futility of pumping an online science poll. Vincent and iCell being behind this effort made it even more special. To the OCAT herd, the Discover poll doesn't represent an opportunity to express their opinion on a subject, rather they see it as a tool to promote their beloved stock. The act of participating in the poll (and spreading the word) with the intention to sway the vote is disingenuous. Failing to see your logic, Tradeup. Contrary to your assertion, voting in the Discovery poll precisely represents an "opportunity to express their opinion on a subject." That's what polls do. Even more of a head-scratcher is your assertion that voting "with the intention to sway the vote is disingenuous." By definition, casting a vote is an act intended to "sway" an outcome--in this case choosing "Stemcells" as the people's choice for science story of the year. How is that disingenuous? Please do not get in a discussion with Tradeup. He obviously is smarter than all of us and makes the best stock trade decisions. I wonder why he wastes his precious time with us common folk. |
|
|
|
Post by icellman on Dec 26, 2014 3:43:06 GMT
Interesting to note that STEM is trading at $ .90 a share. That Bullard really knows how to pick them, doesn't he? LOL!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Dec 26, 2014 12:23:05 GMT
Interesting to note that STEM is trading at $ .90 a share. That Bullard really knows how to pick them, doesn't he? LOL!!!! It is still too early to say. The verdict in the CUR vs STEM trial should be any day now. If STEM wins, which if you have been following their chances look good at the moment, then Bullard could look like a genius. Remember, his first article about STEM was based on the uncertainty surrounding the lawsuit causing a downtrend and creating a buying opportunity. So far that part has held true. Now we'll have to wait and see if a favorable verdict for STEM causes a jump or not. P.S. Let's not derail this thread. Just wanted to respond once to your post. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by icellman on Dec 26, 2014 14:47:56 GMT
Jham-
This is where I don't understand you. Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere. As for defending Bullard, he is nothing but a scumbag and 95 % of the people on this board would agree with me on that. Why you come to his defense time and again makes no sense to me. Sorry if that comes across as harsh, but it's the truth.
|
|
|
|
Post by forthefuture on Dec 26, 2014 15:10:34 GMT
Interesting to note that STEM is trading at $ .90 a share. That Bullard really knows how to pick them, doesn't he? LOL!!!! Can this and subsequent STEM posts be moved to OT or the STEM thread please. |
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Dec 26, 2014 15:12:34 GMT
Jham- This is where I don't understand you. Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere. As for defending Bullard, he is nothing but a scumbag and 95 % of the people on this board would agree with me on that. Why you come to his defense time and again makes no sense to me. Sorry if that comes across as harsh, but it's the truth. icellman, Don't worry, nothing you could say would be too harsh since I don't really take anything you say seriously. "Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere." Says the guy who has ridden Ocata down to where it is today. Maybe STEM won't go anywhere. We'll have to wait and see, but the jury is still out on that, and how it pertains to Bullard's articles. "As for defending Bullard..."? I wasn't defending him. I was just straightening up the facts that you twisted. I'd do the same for you if someone twisted your words. Now I will defend him though. If you and 95% of people on this board think he is a scumbag, that is fine. You can think what you want. Knowing him, I know that he is not a scumbag. If you only knew how well he does in the market you'd would realize how foolish you sound ridiculing him and the stocks he chooses to invest in. |
|
|
|
Post by icellman on Dec 26, 2014 15:50:51 GMT
Nice job moving this post Jham. Anything to protect Bullard. What facts? That STEM was at $ .90? There was nothing to correct.
about an hour ago icellman said:
Jham-
This is where I don't understand you. Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere. As for defending Bullard, he is nothing but a scumbag and 95 % of the people on this board would agree with me on that. Why you come to his defense time and again makes no sense to me. Sorry if that comes across as harsh, but it's the truth.
icellman,
Don't worry, nothing you could say would be too harsh since I don't really take anything you say seriously.
"Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere."
Says the guy who has ridden Ocata down to where it is today. Maybe STEM won't go anywhere. We'll have to wait and see, but the jury is still out on that, and how it pertains to Bullard's articles.
"As for defending Bullard..."? I wasn't defending him. I was just straightening up the facts that you twisted. I'd do the same for you if someone twisted your words. Now I will defend him though. If you and 95% of people on this board think he is a scumbag, that is fine. You can think what you want. Knowing him, I know that he is not a scumbag. If you only knew how well he does in the market you'd would realize how foolish you sound ridiculing him and the stocks he chooses to invest in.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigbang on Dec 26, 2014 15:57:31 GMT
Nice job moving this post Jham. Anything to protect Bullard. What facts? That STEM was at $ .90? There was nothing to correct. about an hour ago icellman said: Jham- This is where I don't understand you. Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere. As for defending Bullard, he is nothing but a scumbag and 95 % of the people on this board would agree with me on that. Why you come to his defense time and again makes no sense to me. Sorry if that comes across as harsh, but it's the truth. icellman, Don't worry, nothing you could say would be too harsh since I don't really take anything you say seriously. "Pipedream if you think STEM is going anywhere." Says the guy who has ridden Ocata down to where it is today. Maybe STEM won't go anywhere. We'll have to wait and see, but the jury is still out on that, and how it pertains to Bullard's articles. "As for defending Bullard..."? I wasn't defending him. I was just straightening up the facts that you twisted. I'd do the same for you if someone twisted your words. Now I will defend him though. If you and 95% of people on this board think he is a scumbag, that is fine. You can think what you want. Knowing him, I know that he is not a scumbag. If you only knew how well he does in the market you'd would realize how foolish you sound ridiculing him and the stocks he chooses to invest in. Bullard pretends to be an expert on patents and ophthalmology and writes pathetic hit pieces. And when he's called out on nit he doesn't have the decency to admit he's wrong. And it's funny to equate success in the stock market as an indication someone is not a scumbag. Tells us all we need to know about ones priorities. |
|
