|
|
Post by CM kipper007 on Jan 5, 2015 16:33:56 GMT
First, Happy New Year to all. I hope you had a happy holiday with your loved ones. I have to agree with stemboat, that the rude name calling was totally uncalled for, and IMO, against TOS here. How bout it JHam, or moderators. I have met John (22) in person and had e-mail exchanges with him. He is one of the kindest, most gentle people I have ever met in my life. He was so supportive of me in my dust up at iCell. He is the kind of person who would not say a bad thing about anyone. After the 2013 Shareholder's Meeting, he was really down with the entire tone of that meeting (GR knew he was on his way out and they couldn't wait to get that meeting over with). He said to me after the meeting "Patti, I'm really going to have to rethink this investment and just not post on the board for a while." He felt so discouraged, I gave him a hug and said "It will be all right John." John has been fighting for a Rights Offering for the longs for a long time. I am really bummed about your derogatory post, knowing John reads here. To know you is to love you Twenty2. I wish I could turn the other cheek like you do. Go OCAT... Patti I didn't even notice that post. I agree it is not right to name call and throw out unnecessary insults. Thanks for editing that out vzvet. Not sure how this is any different than when people insult my friend Bullard. He is one of the nicest people I know who has gone out of his way to help me on several occasions. I don't understand why name calling is rude and a TOS when directed at Twenty2, but almost encouraged when directed at Bullard. Name calling is rude regardless of the person it is being directed at. Just wanted to make that point. No need for anyone to respond. Lol. |
|
|
|
Post by actcforme on Jan 5, 2015 18:38:06 GMT
First, Happy New Year to all. I hope you had a happy holiday with your loved ones. I have to agree with stemboat, that the rude name calling was totally uncalled for, and IMO, against TOS here. How bout it JHam, or moderators. I have met John (22) in person and had e-mail exchanges with him. He is one of the kindest, most gentle people I have ever met in my life. He was so supportive of me in my dust up at iCell. He is the kind of person who would not say a bad thing about anyone. After the 2013 Shareholder's Meeting, he was really down with the entire tone of that meeting (GR knew he was on his way out and they couldn't wait to get that meeting over with). He said to me after the meeting "Patti, I'm really going to have to rethink this investment and just not post on the board for a while." He felt so discouraged, I gave him a hug and said "It will be all right John." John has been fighting for a Rights Offering for the longs for a long time. I am really bummed about your derogatory post, knowing John reads here. To know you is to love you Twenty2. I wish I could turn the other cheek like you do. Go OCAT... Patti I didn't even notice that post. I agree it is not right to name call and throw out unnecessary insults. Thanks for editing that out vzvet. Not sure how this is any different than when people insult my friend Bullard. He is one of the nicest people I know who has gone out of his way to help me on several occasions. I don't understand why name calling is rude and a TOS when directed at Twenty2, but almost encouraged when directed at Bullard. Name calling is rude regardless of the person it is being directed at. Just wanted to make that point. No need for anyone to respond. A little surprised forum owner comparing insults. Be consistent in moderating your site -- PERIOD, no matter who it is. I think it is okay to make comments about someone's investment opinions -- "your opinions about OCAT are nuts and maybe even pumping or vice versa" -- that is not personal, but calling someone a "goofball" or any name gets personal. Seems to me opinions about Bullard are not personal so much as differing opinions about OCAT science and/or management and as I said investing. But I could be wrong, since I do not read all the BS back and forth about Bullard. His SA articles have made him controversial, rightfully so IMO, but I have NO opinion about him as a person because I do not know him and I'm sure most here do not, but I DO know John (22) personally, met in person and can vouch for the guy. The Golden Rule would go a long way here just as it would anywhere in our lives.... |
|
|
|
Post by stemwinder on Jan 5, 2015 19:43:14 GMT
I am surprised at the prissy self-righteousness on display on this board. This is a stock board for discussing money making ideas. Not a Sunday school class.
For some reason people seek to extend this storm in a tea cup into multiple posts and continue to use the original reference (goofball) presumably extending the hurt to the injured party!
I will point out that I modified the term to 'message board eccentric', a group to which I add myself unreservedly.
|
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jan 5, 2015 20:45:52 GMT
I didn't even notice that post. I agree it is not right to name call and throw out unnecessary insults. Thanks for editing that out vzvet. Not sure how this is any different than when people insult my friend Bullard. He is one of the nicest people I know who has gone out of his way to help me on several occasions. I don't understand why name calling is rude and a TOS when directed at Twenty2, but almost encouraged when directed at Bullard. Name calling is rude regardless of the person it is being directed at. Just wanted to make that point. No need for anyone to respond. A little surprised forum owner comparing insults. Be consistent in moderating your site -- PERIOD, no matter who it is. I think it is okay to make comments about someone's investment opinions -- "your opinions about OCAT are nuts and maybe even pumping or vice versa" -- that is not personal, but calling someone a "goofball" or any name gets personal. Seems to me opinions about Bullard are not personal so much as differing opinions about OCAT science and/or management and as I said investing. But I could be wrong, since I do not read all the BS back and forth about Bullard. His SA articles have made him controversial, rightfully so IMO, but I have NO opinion about him as a person because I do not know him and I'm sure most here do not, but I DO know John (22) personally, met in person and can vouch for the guy. The Golden Rule would go a long way here just as it would anywhere in our lives.... Well if you didn't read all of the back and forth then I guess you can't really comment. Why can't the owner of the forum compare insults though? What's that supposed to mean? I have always said Bullard is just as open to criticism as the rest of us, but that there is a difference between criticizing his opinion, and insulting the guy. Sorry, but I don't see the difference in calling twenty2 a goofball and Bullard a scumbag/loser etc...I have known Bullard for 4 years personally and can vouch for him as a nice guy who cares about people. Based on what you wrote above, it sounds like we are in agreement here. Anyway, like I said before no need for anyone to respond, I don't want to derail this tread. Let's go off-topic with this for anyone who wants to continue the conversation (which I think is unnecessary). |
|
|
|
Post by thechurchmaus on Jan 5, 2015 21:09:27 GMT
what has all of this to do with the title of this thread  ?6 posts off topic.are there any moderators out there?if so-do your jobs!!!get your bikkering where it belongs.yahoo board? |
|
|
|
Post by dayanand33 on Jan 5, 2015 21:11:06 GMT
what has all of this to do with the title of this thread ?6 posts off topic.are there any moderators out there?if so-do your jobs!!!get your bikkering where it belongs.yahoo board? That could have been worded better. I appreciate the thankless job that the moderators are doing in their free time. I would feel guilty to be demanding of them. |
|
|
|
Post by ignorantsilver on Jan 7, 2015 0:16:59 GMT
closed at 6.75, but AM Trade shows me a pic of floating poo being eaten by a dog. guess that means uplist tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by ignorantsilver on Jan 7, 2015 0:26:37 GMT
this is very interesting...i just checked again and it now just shows little pieces or flakes of turd floating in the water. looks like a takeover!
|
|
|
|
Post by hophead on Jan 7, 2015 0:37:48 GMT
I'm seeing a big bowl of mostly half digested salad and corn. Looks like beef stew and a possible jv imo!
|
|
|
|
Post by elk on Jan 7, 2015 0:46:35 GMT
this is very interesting...i just checked again and it now just shows little pieces or flakes of turd floating in the water. looks like a takeover! Check again in a few minutes, maybe you will find the turd's a charm. |
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Jan 7, 2015 0:54:04 GMT
millions of comedians are out of work and everyone is trying to be funny. The turd time is a charm. The uplist must be nigh.
|
|
|
|
Post by ignorantsilver on Jan 9, 2015 19:12:40 GMT
Stop asking what ohcaca can do for you, but ask what you can do for ohcaca!
|
|
|
|
Post by hophead on Jan 9, 2015 19:29:53 GMT
Stop asking what ohcaca can do for you, but ask what you can do for ohcaca! Haha! That's terrific! |
|
|
|
Post by DavedS on Jan 10, 2015 3:27:16 GMT
Stop asking what ohcaca can do for you, but ask what you can do for ohcaca! Ich Bin Ein OHCACA! |
|
|
|
Post by hophead on Jan 12, 2015 0:29:08 GMT
Hey ignorant. How are the turds looking on your monitor this week? I'm currently on the ohcaca web page and i'm seeing one of those hard green turds floating on my screen. Actually it's starting to sink to the bottom now. NOt as buoyant as i originally thought. Kind of like ohcaca's pps...
|
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jan 28, 2015 3:36:17 GMT
Also on icell news of poliwog finally closing next week, so we'll see if that's the holdup with ocat uplist. seems like all the goodies are on icell nowadays, esp with hophead gone from here. Yeah, should pay and join then. |
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jan 28, 2015 3:38:40 GMT
Also on icell news of poliwog finally closing next week, so we'll see if that's the holdup with ocat uplist. seems like all the goodies are on icell nowadays, esp with hophead gone from here. P.S. There are plenty of "goodies" here. You just have to wander out of the OCAT forum once in a while. |
|
|
|
Post by kukkido on Jan 28, 2015 7:03:43 GMT
Maybe HopHead can Create his own Topic, kinda like "Hop's daily discussion" and those who want to read what's on his mind can, and others just don't read or reply. I think we spend way to much time disciplining an adult. So, keep him contained in his room, kinda like a timeout. Kukkido |
|
|
|
Post by DavedS on Jan 28, 2015 22:54:47 GMT
Look, I don't agree with much of what Hophead says as he's usually anti Ocata mngmt and makes comments that makes me shake my head, but I don't feel he should be banned. Everyone knows where he's coming from and understands his position. My feeling is if you don't like it, just ignore him. I don't like the idea of banning people anyway. The funny thing is even though his ranting ticked me off at times, he still made me laugh. He means well, but he's just an emotional guy. I'd give him another chance, but it's Jham's forum and I understand and respect why he did it. Sometimes, life is just too complicated. Definitely have some good points there--unfortunately what annoys me the most about Hop is that a lot of what he says I totally agree with! |
|
|
|
Post by ignorantsilver on Feb 20, 2015 19:17:28 GMT
thanks *jham*! hophead certainly is an intimidating presence here. keep up the good work!
*EDIT* - name calling
You already asked and I already told you that I didn't approve of you changing my name. Thanks.
JHam
|
|
?6 posts off topic.are there any moderators out there?if so-do your jobs!!!get your bikkering where it belongs.yahoo board?
