|
Post by selluwud on May 28, 2020 19:02:12 GMT
Tailwinds Research Group is following this issue as a possible court case could decide it's future. Samsung could be on the hook for over a 1 Bil. if they lose. I'm going to venture enough here to pad my funds if they prevail, but not enough to do too much damage if not. Phone technology that was stolen it seems, I like their chances. Also pending lawsuits against other unauthorized manufacturers using their technology. Case is continued until Dec. 2020.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on May 29, 2020 6:57:56 GMT
Tailwinds Research Group is following this issue as a possible court case could decide it's future. Samsung could be on the hook for over a 1 Bil. if they lose. I'm going to venture enough here to pad my funds if they prevail, but not enough to do too much damage if not. Phone technology that was stolen it seems, I like their chances. Also pending lawsuits against other unauthorized manufacturers using their technology. Case is continued until Dec. 2020. I've had this on my watchlist for a while now but don't own any. After getting spanked by MGT and NLST (not really spanked, but lost money with NLST), I am cautious about these patent stocks. It's not that I don't think PRKR doesn't have a good case. They do. It's that I don't trust big brother to not interfere. I am convinced the NLST ruling was influenced big time by congressmen who were connected to and lobbied for the defendants who ultimately won. PRKR could be different, so I will keep my eye on it. I was considering opening a small position the other day on the dip, but just couldn't convince myself to pull the trigger. Good luck!
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on May 29, 2020 13:30:49 GMT
Tailwinds Research Group is following this issue as a possible court case could decide it's future. Samsung could be on the hook for over a 1 Bil. if they lose. I'm going to venture enough here to pad my funds if they prevail, but not enough to do too much damage if not. Phone technology that was stolen it seems, I like their chances. Also pending lawsuits against other unauthorized manufacturers using their technology. Case is continued until Dec. 2020. I've had this on my watchlist for a while now but don't own any. After getting spanked by MGT and NLST (not really spanked, but lost money with NLST), I am cautious about these patent stocks. It's not that I don't think PRKR doesn't have a good case. They do. It's that I don't trust big brother to not interfere. I am convinced the NLST ruling was influenced big time by congressmen who were connected to and lobbied for the defendants who ultimately won. PRKR could be different, so I will keep my eye on it. I was considering opening a small position the other day on the dip, but just couldn't convince myself to pull the trigger. Good luck! For sure it's a gamble, but one that the risk/reward was too great for me to ignore.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jun 1, 2020 3:33:57 GMT
I've had this on my watchlist for a while now but don't own any. After getting spanked by MGT and NLST (not really spanked, but lost money with NLST), I am cautious about these patent stocks. It's not that I don't think PRKR doesn't have a good case. They do. It's that I don't trust big brother to not interfere. I am convinced the NLST ruling was influenced big time by congressmen who were connected to and lobbied for the defendants who ultimately won. PRKR could be different, so I will keep my eye on it. I was considering opening a small position the other day on the dip, but just couldn't convince myself to pull the trigger. Good luck! For sure it's a gamble, but one that the risk/reward was too great for me to ignore. They just did a small raise at $.35. Completed on May 22nd, not announced until a week later. They sound pretty confident about the outcome of the litigation based on the part in blue. www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/914139/000165495420006118/prkr-20200529x8k.htmPrivate Placement of Common Stock On May 22, 2020, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) with the accredited investors identified on Exhibit 10.3 hereof (the “Investors”) for the sale of an aggregate of 1,378,716 shares (“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $0.35 per share for aggregate proceeds of $482,550. The Purchase Agreements also provide the Investors with a contingent payment right whereby the Company will pay each Investor an allocated portion of the Company’s net proceeds from its patent claims, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing the Company and amounts payable to the Company’s litigation financer. The Investor’s allocated portion of such net proceeds will be determined by multiplying (i) the net proceeds recovered by the Company up to $10 million by (ii) the quotient of such Investor’s subscription amount divided by $10 million, up to an amount equal to each Investor’s subscription amount (“Contingent Payment”). The Purchase Agreements also contain customary representations and warranties of the Investors. The proceeds from the sale of the Shares will be used to fund the Company’s operations, including litigation expenses. The Company also entered into registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Investors pursuant to which the Company will register the Shares. The Company has committed to file the registration statement by the 60th calendar day following the closing date and to cause the registration statement to become effective by the 120th calendar day following the closing date. The Registration Rights Agreement provides for liquidated damages upon the occurrence of certain events including failure by the Company to file the registration statement or cause it to become effective by the deadlines set forth above. The amount of the liquidated damages is 1.0% of the aggregate subscription upon the occurrence of the event, and monthly thereafter, up to a maximum of 6%. The Shares were offered and sold to the Investors on a private placement basis under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The foregoing summaries of the Purchase Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements, which are attached as part of Exhibits 10.1 through 10.2 hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jun 1, 2020 3:41:08 GMT
Tailwinds Research Group is following this issue as a possible court case could decide it's future. Samsung could be on the hook for over a 1 Bil. if they lose. I'm going to venture enough here to pad my funds if they prevail, but not enough to do too much damage if not. Phone technology that was stolen it seems, I like their chances. Also pending lawsuits against other unauthorized manufacturers using their technology. Case is continued until Dec. 2020. Here is the summary of the litigation by Tailwinds. You've perked my interest again in this selluwud tailwindsresearch.com/2020/05/parkervisions-day-in-court-coming-soon-executive-summary/Could Be One of The Largest Patent Cases
At this time our estimate for the damages in this case to be a range of $1.65 Billion to $3.3 Billion.----- Not bad for a company with only $200K on the books, lol.
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Dec 7, 2020 20:37:13 GMT
This issue got some action today, for whatever reason. Lots of litigation to be resolved. Volume up.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Dec 8, 2020 17:46:22 GMT
This issue got some action today, for whatever reason. Lots of litigation to be resolved. Volume up. Off to the races today.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Dec 12, 2020 15:16:30 GMT
I’m considering a small position in this one if it heads below $.50 again. Here’s an update from Tailwinds (from September) on where things currently stand with the Qualcomm suit: tailwindsresearch.com/2020/09/making-our-case-for-parkervision/~ Finally, the big daddy of them all, the Qualcomm case, has a lot of catalysts in front of the trial.
-November 9th, you get Expert Reports
-January 18th, Daubert Motions, which determine what evidence is to be allowed in the court. This will be a very big ruling and, I’m sure, hotly contested by both parties.
-February 18th, final pretrial statement. This determines who is allowed to testify at the trial and will also be a very big deal as Qualcomm will try to keep senior people off the witness stand. If they are required to testify, a great sign for PRKR.
-April 14th, final conference before trial.
-And, finally, May 3rd is the actual trial date.
The next seven months should be very busy for ParkerVision, leading up to their big date with the Orlando courts on May 3, 2021. Seven months ago, we thought we’d be getting that case closed right around now. Instead, Covid-19 pushed back timelines.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Dec 24, 2020 2:19:12 GMT
Some Christmas dilution under the tree...: www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/914139/000165495420013895/prkr-20201223xprospsupp5.htmItem 1.01.Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On December 21, 2020, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) with the accredited investors identified on Exhibit 10.3 hereof (the “Investors”) for the sale of an aggregate of 3,342,859 shares (“Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $0.35 per share for aggregate proceeds of $1,170,000. The Purchase Agreements also provide the Investors with a contingent payment right whereby the Company will pay each Investor an allocated portion of the Company’s net proceeds from its patent claims, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing the Company and amounts payable to the Company’s litigation financer. The Investor’s allocated portion of such net proceeds will be determined by multiplying (i) the net proceeds recovered by the Company up to $10 million by (ii) the quotient of such Investor’s subscription amount divided by $10 million, up to an amount equal to each Investor’s subscription amount (“Contingent Payment”). The Purchase Agreements also contain customary representations and warranties of the Investors. The proceeds from the sale of the Shares will be used to fund the Company’s operations, including litigation expenses. The Company also entered into registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Investors pursuant to which the Company will register the Shares. The Company has committed to file the registration statement by April 15, 2021 and to cause the registration statement to become effective by April 30, 2021 (or, in the case of a review by the Commission, by June 30, 2021). The Registration Rights Agreement provides for liquidated damages upon the occurrence of certain events including failure by the Company to file the registration statement or cause it to become effective by the deadlines set forth above. The amount of the liquidated damages is 1.0% of the aggregate subscription upon the occurrence of the event, and monthly thereafter, up to a maximum of 6%.
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Jan 27, 2021 12:23:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Jan 27, 2021 14:06:44 GMT
I was hoping to get back in before the markman hearing yesterday, but it rose too fast and I couldn’t pull the trigger. This ruling is great news for Parkervision. They should win the case if there isn’t a settlement beforehand. Good luck to everyone holding.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 1, 2021 17:26:29 GMT
Congrats to all of you holding. Especially those of you who were buying in the $.40s and lower. This could really run heading into the hearing.
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Feb 2, 2021 10:56:33 GMT
yep, holding and watching the tape.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 2, 2021 13:07:09 GMT
yep, holding and watching the tape. Awesome!
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Feb 2, 2021 18:27:12 GMT
The gift that keeps on giving
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 26, 2021 17:02:09 GMT
Ok ok I lied again. Saw that this was beat down a bit and opened a very small position. This is total gambling money. If I lose it all it’s a drop in the bucket. But if PRKR wins and the pps goes to $10 I’ll be able to buy a new washer and dryer which I desperately need
|
|
|
Post by selluwud on Feb 27, 2021 1:21:32 GMT
Ok ok I lied again. Saw that this was beat down a bit and opened a very small position. This is total gambling money. If I lose it all it’s a drop in the bucket. But if PRKR wins and the pps goes to $10 I’ll be able to buy a new washer and dryer which I desperately need Here's to future happy wash/laundry days.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 27, 2021 3:04:17 GMT
Ok ok I lied again. Saw that this was beat down a bit and opened a very small position. This is total gambling money. If I lose it all it’s a drop in the bucket. But if PRKR wins and the pps goes to $10 I’ll be able to buy a new washer and dryer which I desperately need Here's to future happy wash/laundry days. The positive ruling for NLST today is what gave me the courage to dive in here. I know it was just a ruling on venue, but still, that coupled with PRKR's markman hearing is a bullish sign that imo that the system is not rigged against small companies going after the big fish. I may even add more if it dips down again.
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 27, 2021 3:39:58 GMT
A poster who I follow on ST who I go back and forth with sometimes has been pounding the table for a while. Here are some of his recent posts that have gotten me more bullish on this one, fwiw:
1/28/21
$PRKR extremely positive markman for PRKR. Judge basically adopted their langauage and where he tweaked it it all helped PRKR. Not only that, he split the 9 patents into 2 future trials as 9 too many for a jury to focus on. Most other judges woulda said Prkr give us your best 4
And with the markman totally in PRKRs favor, we could see up to $500 mm from Intel. And there are 4 open lawsuits based on exactly the same Claims. Those are now likely to settle seeing the writing on the wall. Which is hugely positive in case against QCOM as shows that they have a viable licensing biz and paying clients. And there are literally 100-200 more companies that they can go after settlements from and this ruling sets the stage
Of course, May 3rd QCOM case is granddaddy of them all. IMO they will win and get north of $2.0 B. With Intel, etc, call it $2.5 B. Keep 70% after lawyers and were talking $1.75 B plus on going royalties.
Yet PRKR has MV of $47 mm. You do the math 😁
---
$PRKR another point. PRKR is highly highly likely to reach settlements with numerous players who are stealing its tech. I’m talking about smaller dollar amounts, maybe $1.0 Mm each, but when you add up 100-200 companies the numbers add up pretty fast. Maybe as much as $100 mm in ongoing royalties from the little guys. And ongoing royalties get MUltiples. Call it 15x, or cut it to 8-10x accounting for lawyer fees and taxes. And that another $800 mm-$1.0B in value creation
And when they start reaching these deals, it is extremely helpful in the qcom jury trial. Why? Because QCOM, the sleazy patent thief’s that they are, will say PRKR is a patent troll (patently false - pun intended). Royalties from others massively beefs up PRKRs credibility. Plus they can say we get x $ per part from some random Japanese company. Makes QCOM look like greedy bastards when they try to avoid paying anything
Gotta win QCOM case. No doubt. But odds V good. 20 bagger lurking
---
2/27/21
$PRKR 2 plus months til qcom trial May 3. Highly likely Prkr wins. And stock worth $15-20 bucks. Stock should rally into trial. Great time and price to add
And no, QCOM won’t settle.
A few folks losing patience based on TWITs. Huh? We know the timeline. May 3 trial starts. Can’t wait. Then sell me your shares
Be there or be square😎
|
|
|
Post by JHam on Feb 28, 2021 17:34:23 GMT
|
|